Cities are rewriting growth rules as wealth rises, pollution drops and a long-assumed link starts to break


seattle
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

Cities are a double-edged sword. They provide plenty of job opportunities, and most of the world's money is made in them, but on the other hand, they create most of the planet's pollution. For decades, the prevailing view has been that the two go hand in hand. Essentially, if you want cities to prosper even more, you have to accept that there is going to be pollution. But that relationship may be weakening.

An assessment of 2,475 of the world's biggest cities found that 80% are growing their economies while reducing their fossil fuel pollution. The findings are published in the journal Nature Cities.

To track thousands of cities simultaneously, researchers used satellite data to measure tropospheric nitrogen dioxide levels from January 2019 to December 2024. The gas is often used as a stand-in or proxy for fossil fuel combustion because it comes directly from power plants, factories, and tailpipes. "Our approach provides a focused, observable and globally consistent proxy for one central pillar of green growth," noted the team in their paper.

They also looked at the GDP (gross domestic product) for cities with more than 100,000 residents. Putting these two together allowed them to see which cities were getting richer while their air was getting cleaner, and which were growing but burning even more fossil fuel.

The study measured more than 5,000 cities overall, but 2,919 showed no significant change in nitrogen dioxide levels, and were therefore excluded from further analyses.

Global shift to green growth

The findings revealed that China is leading the way with more than 700 cities growing while cleaning their air. These include major centers such as Beijing and Shanghai. In Europe, cities such as Amsterdam, Berlin, and Paris showed a similar pattern. According to the researchers, this is due to policies such as low-emission zones and the electrification of public transport.

North American cities like Seattle, Vancouver, and San Jose also increased their wealth while reducing pollution levels.

Cities are growing richer while cleaning their air
Population-adjusted changes in NO2 TVCD across cities worldwide (with populations >100,000) from 2019 to 2024. Credit: Nature Cities (2026). DOI: 10.1038/s44284-026-00440-0

Uneven progress

However, progress is not the same everywhere. About 16% of the cities are still growing by burning more fossil fuels. These tended to be India, Iran, and Russia, where economic expansion is still closely tied to heavy industry and increased traffic. As the study authors noted, "Decoupling fossil fuel pollution and growth is possible (and underway in many cities), but the global picture remains uneven."

While the outlook presented by the paper is encouraging, the research has its limitations. Among these are that nitrogen dioxide is not a perfect proxy for all fossil fuel emissions, and the study period is short and overlapped with the disruptions caused by the COVID pandemic.

Nonetheless, the scientists have developed a useful way to regularly monitor how well urban green policies are working and guide investments toward more sustainable cities.

Publication details

Amirhossein Hassani et al, Global mapping of city-level economic growth decoupling from fossil fuels, Nature Cities (2026). DOI: 10.1038/s44284-026-00440-0

© 2026 Science X Network

Follow us on Google News Add as preferred source

Science X news — your source for the latest and most interesting science updates. Follow us on Google News for updates, or set sciencex.com as your preferred source for more science stories.

Citation: Cities are rewriting growth rules as wealth rises, pollution drops and a long-assumed link starts to break (2026, May 13) retrieved 13 May 2026 from https://sciencex.com/news/2026-05-cities-rewriting-growth-wealth-pollution.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Written for you by our author Paul Arnold, edited by Lisa Lock, and fact-checked and reviewed by Robert Egan—this article is the result of careful human work. We rely on readers like you to keep independent science journalism alive. If this reporting matters to you, please consider a donation (especially monthly).

Who's behind this story?
Paul Arnold
Paul Arnold

BSc Biology from University of London. BBC documentary producer with world travel experience. Freelances from southern Spain. Full profile →

Lisa Lock
Lisa Lock

BA art history, MA material culture. Former museum editor, paramedic, and transplant coordinator. Editing for Science X since 2021. Full profile →

Robert Egan
Robert Egan

Bachelor's in mathematical biology, Master's in creative writing. Well-traveled with unique perspectives on science and language. Full profile →