This Science News Wire page contains a press release issued by an organization and is provided to you "as is" with little or no review from Science X staff.

Johns Hopkins ethicists to discuss sickle cell disease impact and treatment

September 25th, 2012

September is sickle cell disease awareness month, and faculty members of the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics are taking an active role in increasing understanding of this debilitating disease and the ethical dimensions of its treatment and impact.

Bioethicist Carlton Haywood Jr., PhD, MA, a sickle cell disease patient, researcher and advocate, will moderate the Lonzie Lee Jones Patient Advocacy Symposium Thursday, September 27, part of the 40th annual convention of the Sickle Cell Disease Association of America. The convention will be held September 25 – 29, 2012 at the Marriott Waterfront Hotel in Baltimore, MD.

Joann Rodgers, MS, also a faculty member at the Berman Institute, will be a panelist at the Symposium, discussing strategies to increase the public understanding of sickle cell disease (SCD) from her 25 years of experience at the helm of the public affairs office of Johns Hopkins Medicine. Haywood will give a separate address at the convention on Friday, September 28, titled "Your Voice Can Change the World! (From Personal to Legislative Perspectives)."

The most commonly known symptoms of SCD, a genetic disorder, are chronic and acute pain attacks, called "pain crises," that occur when misshaped red blood cells become stuck in blood vessels, depriving tissues throughout the body of oxygen. Powerful narcotic pain medicines such as morphine and Dilaudid are used to treat the intense and sudden episodes, but studies show that emergency room and other physicians are sometimes reluctant to prescribe them because of their fear of patient addiction.

Adding to a physicans' wariness is that some with SCD are in and out of the hospital frequently, asking for specific narcotics or specific doses of narcotics to treat pain that by its nature cannot be objectively assessed. Then, as Haywood points out, there's the reality that most people in the U.S. with the disease are African-American, and that many are of lower socioeconomic status. All of those factors can combine to inhibit trust building between the physician and the patient.

"I think both of those issues—race and class—interact with certain aspects of the culture of medicine," Haywood says. "The culture of medicine is such that, clinicians are already a little hesitant about prescribing some of these powerful opioid analgesics because they don't want patients to become addicted. I think that issues of race and class can make the situation even more complicated," he says.

Earlier in September, Haywood was a keynote speaker at the North Carolina Sickle Cell Syndrome and Thalassemia Partners Conference. In his lecture, titled, "Taking Control: Finding Your Voice with Sickle Cell Disease," he shared his experience both living with and researching the disease, and the reciprocal impact of one upon the other. "My research on issues of respect and trust in sickle cell disease is driven in large part by my experiences as an individual living with the disease who has felt the frustration of having my voice and my perspectives go unheeded by clinicians responsible for my care," Haywood says.

Provided by Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Citation: Johns Hopkins ethicists to discuss sickle cell disease impact and treatment (2012, September 25) retrieved 4 August 2026 from https://sciencex.com/wire-news/110021423/johns-hopkins-ethicists-to-discuss-sickle-cell-disease-impact-an.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.