This Science News Wire page contains a press release issued by an organization and is provided to you "as is" with little or no review from Science X staff.

Drugs: 'New' does not always mean 'better'

March 2nd, 2012

Cases in which a newly approved drug is more effective than the cheaper alternatives already available are the exceptions rather than the rule. This is the conclusion reached in a study by Mariam Ujeyl et al. in the current issue of Deutsches Ärzteblatt International (Dtsch Arztebl Int 2012; 109[7]: 117-23).

Research into 39 proprietary medicinal products (PMPs) launched on the German market in 2009 and 2010 shows that there were frequently insufficient data available on efficacy when approval was granted. The legal requirements of the licensing procedure have never yet required direct data comparing a new drug to a commercially available drug. The researchers' evaluations also show that for around half of approvals the only trials presented compared the new drug with a placebo, not an effective comparator drug. This can give rise to room for interpretation regarding pricing when new drugs are marketed. The authors do not even rule out the possibility that these more expensive PMPs may actually be inferior to the alternatives already on the market.

More information:
www.aerzteblatt.de/int/archive/article?id=122468

Provided by Deutsches Aerzteblatt International

Citation: Drugs: 'New' does not always mean 'better' (2012, March 2) retrieved 8 August 2026 from https://sciencex.com/wire-news/92144254/drugs-new-does-not-always-mean-better.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.