Solar panels capture more sunlight with capsaicin, the chemical that makes chili peppers spicy
Here's some news hot off the press. Researchers have found a secret ingredient for making solar panels that absorb the sun's energy more efficiently. Depending on what you like to eat, there's a good chance you can find it at home. Capsaicin, the chemical that gives chili peppers their spicy sting, also improves perovskite solar cells—the devices that make up solar panels.
Adding capsaicin expands the grains which make up the active material of the solar cell, allowing it to more effectively transport electricity. More importantly, the material goes from having a deficit of electrons to having an excess, changing how the cell operates and allowing more sunlight to be converted to electricity. In essence, adding capsaicin adds electrons, which may or may not be the same effect you experience on your tongue after a particularly spicy biryani.
The capsaicin-laced cells are among some of the most efficient that have been reported. Rather than a gimmick to grab headlines, adding this chemical from chili peppers may actually be a route to improving the performance of solar cells.
But why would you think to add chili peppers to a solar panel in the first place? Unfortunately, the researchers didn't share their thought process. But I happen to have form in this area too.
A light bulb moment
In 2014, I published a paper demonstrating how a compound called magnesium chloride could dramatically reduce the cost of solar energy, albeit in a different type of solar cell. Haven't heard of magnesium chloride? Well if you're vegan, you've probably consumed it at one time or another.
It's a salt not too dissimilar to table salt (sodium chloride) and it can be recovered from sea water. It has many uses, but one of its most popular is in Japanese cooking, where it's known as nigari and used as the coagulant for thickening tofu. My findings led to some media coverage of "tofu solar", which was fun, and me getting called tofu boy at academic conferences (less fun).
Does this mean food chemicals transfer particularly well to solar cell research? Not really. The coincidence has more to do with the overlap between food and chemistry and the "what if" approach that guides a lot of material scientists.
You might think that most solar cell research is done by physicists. This is partly true—I'm one myself, after all—but the research approach has little in common with work done by particle physicists at the large hadron collider, or Stephen Hawking-fronted cosmological research. Those fields generally revolve around heavy computation and theory work. In other words, a lot of time staring at blackboards.
Solar cell research is really a matter of materials science, which sits somewhere between physics and chemistry. The development of new solar cell technologies or processes is very labour-intensive, and the typical approach is to spend a great deal of time testing the performance of a large number of comparable but slightly altered cell designs. Solar cells are comprised of stacked layers of different materials, and it's hard to predict what will happen to the performance of the entire structure by changing one component.
If I add something to layer A and it changes, then layers B, C and D on top of it will probably change as well. Similarly, if I change layer C, will I need to change how I made A or B and what will then happen to D? You can probably get a sense of how hard this would be to predict, and this feeds the curiosity behind much of the innovation in this field.
Think of solar cells like cake. To find out what will happen when you add a novel ingredient, it's far more reliable to bake it and then sample the final concoction than to try and predict what it will look and taste like before you bake it.
In the end, the food we eat, just like solar cells, is a mix of compounds. While we know capsaicin from chili, it's really just an organic compound called C₁₈H₂₇NO₃, which, coincidentally, has particular properties that make it suitable for solar cell processing—as well as for spicing up a fajita.
For my own part, I had developed the process of using magnesium chloride and only later found out when I came to write the paper that it was used in tofu. I wasn't inspired in the vegan food aisle, sadly. So, these approaches are not as weird and wacky as they sound when you first read about them. There is usually some initial logic that's based on the inherent chemistry of these compounds, and these flights of scientific fancy are often what leads to interesting breakthroughs.
So, if in the near future you read an article about solar cells improved immeasurably by adding nutmeg or something, trust that it's been done as a result of informed curiosity of the likely effect, rather than boredom and a looming best-before date.
This story is part of Science X Dialog, where researchers can report findings from their published research articles. Visit this page for information about ScienceX Dialog and how to participate. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.